624
1948-JUN-17 · Conyngham Township, Pennsylvania

United Air Lines — Flight 624

United Airlines Flight 624 was a multi-leg coast-to-coast flight originating in San Diego with stopovers in Los Angeles and Chicago that crashed into a hillside in Conyngham Township, Pennsylvania, after the crew was incapacitated by carbon dioxide (CO2) gas. Following a false fire warning in the forward cargo hold after departing Chicago, the pilots discharged the CO2 fire extinguishing system but failed to open the required pressure relief valves. The gas seeped into the cockpit, causing the crew to lose consciousness during an emergency descent. The aircraft struck a 66,000-volt transformer and power lines before impacting a wooded hillside.

Aircraft
Douglas DC-6
Registration
NC37506
Phase
Cruise
Cause
Human Factors (Operational)
Souls on Board
43
Fatalities
43
Origin → Dest
San Diego International Airport, CA → LaGuardia Airport, NY
Report
Final

Investigation Summary

The accident highlighted a critical design flaw in the DC-6's fire suppression system and its associated emergency procedures. At the time, the DC-6 used a CO2-based system that required pilots to manually open cabin pressure relief valves before discharge to prevent the gas from entering the pressurized cabin and cockpit. During the high-stress environment of a perceived fire, the crew of Flight 624 missed this step. Furthermore, the oxygen masks provided were rebreathers that mixed cockpit air with oxygen; because the procedure also dictated shutting off the oxygen supply during CO2 discharge, the masks were ineffective against the gas concentration. This crash occurred only months after the DC-6 fleet had been grounded due to in-flight fires, and it was later revealed that Douglas test pilots had experienced near-incapacitation during tests but the findings were not fully shared with operators or the CAA.

Final Conclusions

The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) determined the probable cause was the incapacitation of the crew by a concentration of CO2 gas in the cockpit. The board noted that the emergency procedure was overly complex for a high-workload environment and failed to account for human error. The fire warning that triggered the sequence was found to be false, caused by unreliable smoke detectors that were prone to false positives.

Video Analysis

Toxic Leak | United Airlines Flight 624 — A detailed look at how a false fire alarm and a poorly designed fire suppression system led to the incapacitation of the crew and the loss of all 43 people on board a Douglas DC-6 in 1948.

If playback is blocked, the owner has disabled embedding — use the link above.

Airframe & Maintenance

Airframe Hours
1,245
Engines
Pratt & Whitney R-2800

Systems & Failure Modes

i

CO2 Fire Extinguishing System

A system designed to flood cargo compartments with CO2; it lacked an automatic ventilation interlock, requiring manual valve operation.

i

Cabin Pressure Relief Valves

Manual valves intended to vent the cabin during CO2 discharge to prevent passenger and crew suffocation.

i

Rebreather Oxygen Masks

Pilot masks that mixed ambient air with oxygen, making them useless if the ambient air was saturated with CO2.

Interesting Facts

  • 01The aircraft, 'Mainliner Utah', had returned to service only two weeks prior following a fleet-wide grounding.
  • 02The fire warning was false; post-crash inspection found no evidence of fire in the cargo compartments.
  • 03United Air Lines had recorded 44 false smoke detector alarms in the four months preceding the crash.
  • 04Douglas test pilots had reported being 'almost completely out' during CO2 system tests in early 1948.
  • 05Notable fatalities included Broadway impresario Earl Carroll, actress Beryl Wallace, and Esquire co-founder Henry L. Jackson.

Safety Actions & Advisories

Fire System Redesign

Douglas redesigned the DC-6 fire extinguisher system to automatically open pressure relief valves when the CO2 was discharged.

Ventilation Improvements

An additional relief valve was added to the DC-6 design to further reduce CO2 concentrations in the cabin after system activation.

Known Controversies & Unanswered Questions

Withholding of Test Data

Reference ↗

During litigation, it was revealed that Douglas test pilots had documented CO2 hazards in early 1948, but a chief test pilot reportedly marked the findings 'Do not discuss with CAA', and the full report was not shared with United before the accident.

Location

Conyngham Township, Pennsylvania · 40.8204, -76.3610

Case File History

  1. New evidenceUpdated event timeline and findings.

Related Cases

Case ID · ua624-1948Last updated · Filed

© 2026 TechBridge Software Co., Ltd. — BlackBoxWiki is an open aviation reference. Not affiliated with any aviation authority.