61708
2011-MAR-05 · Garbuzovo, Belgorod Oblast, Russia

Voronezh Aircraft Production Association - VASO — Flight 61708

An Antonov An-148-100E undergoing a pre-delivery demonstration and training flight suffered an in-flight structural failure after the crew inadvertently exceeded the aircraft's maximum design speed by 110 km/h. During an emergency descent maneuver, the aircraft entered a state of low-frequency oscillations that led to the breakup of the airframe. All six people on board, including two Myanmar Air Force representatives and four Russian crew members, were killed when the wreckage fell near the village of Garbuzovo.

Aircraft
Antonov An-148-100E
Registration
61708
Phase
Cause
Souls on Board
6
Fatalities
6
Origin → Dest
Voronezh-Pridacha Airport → Voronezh-Pridacha Airport
Report

Investigation Summary

The accident occurred during the 32nd flight of the airframe, which was being prepared for delivery to the Myanmar Air Force. The flight profile included an emergency descent exercise. During this maneuver, the crew permitted the aircraft to accelerate significantly beyond its Never Exceed Speed (VNE), reaching speeds 110 km/h (59 knots) above the design limit. This excessive speed induced severe aerodynamic stress and low-frequency vibrations across all three axes. The resulting alternating accelerations exceeded the structural safety margins of the airframe, causing parts of the horizontal stabilizer and elevator to detach in flight. The investigation highlighted that the crew's coordination was inadequate and they deviated from the procedures established in the flight manual. Furthermore, the basic flight instruments provided misleading indications once the aircraft was pushed outside its normal operating envelope, complicating the crew's ability to recover.

Final Conclusions

The investigation, completed in April 2011, concluded that the primary cause was the inadvertent acceleration of the aircraft to 110 km/h above its maximum design speed during an emergency descent. This led to structural failure and in-flight breakup. Contributing factors included poor crew coordination, deviations from the flight manual, and misleading instrument indications while operating outside the design envelope.

Video Analysis

No video analysis linked for this case file yet.

Airframe & Maintenance

Cycles
32

Systems & Failure Modes

i

Airframe Structure

The airframe suffered a total structural failure when low-frequency oscillations, caused by excessive airspeed, exceeded the material strength limits.

i

Flight Instruments

Basic flight instruments provided misleading indications to the crew once the aircraft exceeded its characteristic operating conditions.

i

Horizontal Stabilizer

Parts of the horizontal stabilizer and elevator were found 2-3 km from the main crash site, indicating they were among the first components to fail.

Interesting Facts

  • 01The aircraft was being readied for delivery to the Myanmar Air Force.
  • 02The wreckage was strewn along a 3-kilometer-long track.
  • 03The aircraft had completed only 31 flights prior to the accident flight.
  • 04The type had been granted extended certification just days before the crash.
  • 05The crew exceeded the design limit speed by 110 km/h (approximately 59 knots).
  • 06The aircraft's Manufacturer Serial Number (MSN) was 41-03.
  • 07This was the first hull loss and fatal accident involving the Antonov An-148 type.

Safety Actions & Advisories

Crew Coordination Training

The investigation emphasized the need for improved crew resource management and coordination during high-stress maneuvers like emergency descents.

Location

Garbuzovo, Belgorod Oblast, Russia · 50.4750, 38.7444

Case File History

  1. New evidenceUpdated findings.
  2. New evidenceUpdated findings.

Related Cases

Case ID · vaso-61708-2011Last updated · Filed

© 2026 TechBridge Software Co., Ltd. — BlackBoxWiki is an open aviation reference. Not affiliated with any aviation authority.