EP3704
2018-FEB-18 · Mount Dena, near Semirom, Iran

Iran Aseman Airlines — Flight EP3704

Iran Aseman Airlines Flight 3704 crashed into the Mount Dena range during its approach to Yasuj, killing all 66 people on board. The flight crew descended below the minimum safe altitude (MSA) in poor weather conditions and encountered a severe mountain wave downdraft. The aircraft entered a stall condition at low altitude, and the crew failed to execute a proper stall recovery before impacting the mountainside. The investigation highlighted significant human factors, including poor cockpit resource management and the crew's decision to continue the approach despite weather conditions being below the airline's authorized minimums.

Aircraft
ATR 72-212
Registration
EP-ATS
Phase
Cause
Souls on Board
66
Fatalities
66
Origin → Dest
Tehran-Mehrabad Airport (THR) → Yasuj Airport (YES)
Report

Investigation Summary

The flight was operating in an area known for complex mountainous terrain and significant meteorological hazards. As the aircraft approached Yasuj, the crew was cleared to FL170, but they unilaterally decided to descend to FL150 to get clear of the cloud ceiling, which was reported at 15,000 feet. This altitude was below the sector's Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA) of 15,500 feet. While at FL150, the aircraft encountered a mountain wave, a phenomenon where horizontal airflow is disturbed by mountains, creating powerful vertical currents. Initially, an updraft caused the autopilot to reduce engine power to flight idle to maintain the target altitude. When the aircraft then entered a severe downdraft (reaching 3,000 ft/min), the autopilot pitched the nose up to maintain FL150, causing the airspeed to bleed off rapidly. The crew, likely suffering from reduced situational awareness and lack of training regarding mountain waves, failed to apply full power or set the correct flap configuration during the subsequent stall. The Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS) sounded, but the aircraft was already too low for a successful recovery in the terrain.

Final Conclusions

The Iranian Civil Aviation Organization (CAO) concluded that the primary cause was human error. Specifically, the crew continued the flight to Yasuj despite weather conditions being below minimums, descended below the authorized altitude and MSA, and failed to follow standard stall recovery procedures. Contributing factors included the airline's inadequate supervision and training regarding mountain waves, the lack of SIGMET warnings for the phenomenon, and the absence of an Aircraft Performance Monitoring (APM) system to alert the crew to performance degradation.

Video Analysis

No video analysis linked for this case file yet.

Airframe & Maintenance

Airframe Hours
28,857
Cycles
28,497
Engines
P&W Canada PW126

Crew Experience

Captain

Total hours
17,000
On type
12,000

Identified as Hojatollah Foolad, age 62.

First Officer

Total hours
1,800
On type
197

Identified as Kaveh Khalili, age 36.

Systems & Failure Modes

i

Autopilot

The autopilot attempted to maintain the unauthorized altitude of FL150 during vertical wind shifts, leading to a dangerous reduction in airspeed when countering a downdraft.

i

EGPWS

The Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System provided a terrain alert four seconds after the crew re-engaged the autopilot, but the aircraft's low energy state and altitude made impact unavoidable.

i

Anti-ice System

The crew switched off the de-ice and anti-ice systems shortly before entering the downdraft, despite being in an area favorable for severe icing.

Interesting Facts

  • 01The aircraft had been in storage for seven years and was restored to service only three months before the accident.
  • 02The captain had over 17,000 total flying hours, with 12,000 hours on the ATR 72.
  • 03The minimum ceiling for landing at Yasuj was 11,000 ft, but the actual ceiling was 9,000 ft at the time of dispatch.
  • 04The wreckage was located 350 feet below the top of a 13,412 ft high mountain peak.
  • 05The investigation found the crew had never been trained on how to handle mountain wave phenomena.

Safety Actions & Advisories

Mountain Wave Training

The Iran CAO recommended that all Iranian airlines include training programs specifically addressing the hazards of mountain waves.

Stall Recovery Revision

A recommendation was made to EASA to revise the stall recovery procedures for the ATR 72-212 to ensure clarity and effectiveness.

Search and Rescue Coordination

The Iran CAO was tasked with developing a better Aviation Search and Rescue program to improve coordination during disaster responses.

Fleet Suspension

Source ↗

On February 23, 2018, the Iran Civil Aviation Organization temporarily suspended all Iran Aseman Airlines ATR 72 operations pending further investigation.

Known Controversies & Unanswered Questions

Impact of Economic Sanctions

Reference ↗

Journalists and Iranian officials suggested that international sanctions prevented the airline from obtaining modern aircraft and spare parts, forcing the continued use of older airframes like EP-ATS.

Location

Mount Dena, near Semirom, Iran · 30.8236, 51.6156

ACCIDENT SITE · Coordinates taken from the official investigation report.

Case File History

  1. CorrectionUpdated safety actions and event timeline.
  2. CorrectionUpdated event timeline.

Related Cases

Case ID · iran-aseman-3704-2018Last updated · Filed

© 2026 TechBridge Software Co., Ltd. — BlackBoxWiki is an open aviation reference. Not affiliated with any aviation authority.