910
1952-JUN-28 · Dallas, Texas

Mid-air Collision — American Airlines 910 / Private N3858K

An American Airlines Douglas DC-6 collided in mid-air with a private Temco Swift while both aircraft were on final approach to Dallas Love Field. The DC-6, carrying 60 people, was established on the ILS glidepath when the smaller Swift, which had failed to establish proper two-way radio communication with the tower, flew into its path from below. The Swift's left wing was severed by the airliner's outer right propeller, causing it to spin into a residential street, killing both occupants. The DC-6 sustained only minor damage and landed safely with no injuries to those on board.

Aircraft 1
American Airlines — Flight 910
Douglas DC-6 · N90750
San Francisco International Airport, CADallas Love Field, TX
Souls 60 · Fatal 0
Aircraft 2
Private — Flight N3858K
Temco Swift GC-1B · N3858K
Denton, TXDallas Love Field, TX
Souls 2 · Fatal 2
Phase
Cause
Total Souls
62
Total Fatalities
2
Report

Investigation Summary

The collision occurred at approximately 400 feet above ground level, roughly 1.3 kilometers northwest of the runway. American Airlines Flight 910 was a multi-stop service originating from San Francisco International Airport; the accident occurred during the final leg from its last intermediate stop in El Paso to Dallas. The First Officer was flying the aircraft from the right seat, using the ILS localizer and glidepath for guidance while maintaining visual lookout. Simultaneously, a Temco Swift piloted by a 19-year-old private pilot who had received his license only three days prior was approaching from Denton, Texas. The Swift pilot requested a straight-in approach but did not provide his position, heading, or speed, and failed to confirm landing clearance. A controller at Love Field spotted the Swift but misidentified it as a larger Beechcraft Bonanza, leading to an error in depth perception; he initially believed the aircraft was safely behind the DC-6. By the time the controller realized the Swift was actually a smaller, closer aircraft on a collision course and issued a turn command, it was too late to prevent the impact.

Final Conclusions

The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) released its final report on March 3, 1953. The primary cause was determined to be the Swift pilot's failure to exercise reasonable prudence and caution during his approach, specifically by failing to establish proper communication and continuing a straight-in approach without clearance. A contributing factor was the air traffic controller's error in judgment and misidentification of the Swift, which delayed corrective instructions. Investigators also noted that the Swift's radio system had corroded wiring, which likely hampered the pilot's ability to communicate effectively with the tower.

Video Analysis

No video analysis linked for this case file yet.

Airframe & Maintenance

Private N3858K — Temco Swift GC-1B · N3858K

Last Major Check
Manufactured 1948-05-24
Engines
Serial number 3558

Crew Experience

Private N3858K — Temco Swift GC-1B · N3858K

Pilot

Total hours
250

Paul Brower

Systems & Failure Modes

i

Radio Communication

Corroded wiring was found between the Swift's radio and antenna, potentially explaining the pilot's failure to maintain two-way contact with the tower.

i

ILS Glidepath

The DC-6 crew was using the Instrument Landing System for guidance during a VFR approach to ensure a stabilized path to Runway 13.

Interesting Facts

  • 01The Swift pilot had logged only 250 total flight hours and had held his private license for just three days.
  • 02The DC-6 was almost unscathed, suffering only minor damage to a propeller and a fuselage-mounted radio antenna.
  • 03The post-crash fire in the Swift wreckage was caused by a spectator's discarded cigarette igniting leaking fuel, not the impact itself.
  • 04The Swift was positioned below and to the right of the DC-6, placing it in a potential blind spot for the airliner crew.
  • 05Both occupants of the Swift were employees of Central Airlines at Love Field.

Safety Actions & Advisories

VFR Approach Procedures

The investigation emphasized that under VFR, if a pilot cannot establish clear radio contact, they must operate under the assumption that conflicting traffic exists and exercise extreme caution.

Location

Dallas, Texas · 32.8481, -96.8511

Case File History

  1. CorrectionUpdated investigation summary.
  2. CorrectionUpdated event timeline.

Related Cases

Case ID · dallas-mid-air-collision-1952Last updated · Filed

© 2026 TechBridge Software Co., Ltd. — BlackBoxWiki is an open aviation reference. Not affiliated with any aviation authority.