141
1973-FEB-19 · Near Prague Ruzyně Airport, Czechoslovakia

Aeroflot — Flight 141

Aeroflot Flight 141 crashed short of the runway at Prague Ruzyne Airport after an abrupt nose-down pitch during final approach. The aircraft struck frozen ground, broke apart, and was consumed by fire. While the Czechoslovak commission could not definitively determine the cause, Soviet investigators attributed the accident to the captain erroneously moving the horizontal stabilizer from the landing to the flight position at a low altitude, which created an unrecoverable nose-down moment.

Aircraft
Tupolev Tu-154
Registration
CCCP-85023
Phase
Approach
Cause
Pilot Error
Souls on Board
100
Fatalities
66
Origin → Dest
Sheremetyevo International Airport, USSR → Prague Ruzyně Airport, Czechoslovakia
Report
Final

Investigation Summary

The accident occurred during the first year of the Tu-154's commercial service. As the aircraft passed the Liboc outer marker, it suddenly pitched down at an angle of 4.62 degrees. The crew attempted to recover by applying full power and pulling back on the control columns, but the elevators lacked sufficient authority to counteract the aerodynamic forces generated by the misconfigured stabilizer. The aircraft struck the ground 467 meters short of the runway; while some sources state the nose wheel struck first, others indicate the right wing made initial contact, triggering an immediate fire. The investigation highlighted significant CRM issues, as the cockpit was overcrowded with eight crew members, including multiple inspectors and a trainee radio operator with only two hours of experience on the Tu-154, which likely disrupted coordination during the critical landing phase.

Final Conclusions

The Soviet commission concluded that the primary cause was pilot error involving the improper manipulation of the stabilizer control switch. The switch design allowed the stabilizer to move from -5.5 degrees to 0 degrees without a clear tactile or visual warning to the crew. This change removed the nose-up pitching moment required for landing, causing the aircraft to dive. The presence of excess personnel in the cockpit was cited as a contributing factor that hindered effective communication and monitoring.

Video Analysis

No video analysis linked for this case file yet.

Airframe & Maintenance

Airframe Hours
459
Cycles
261

Crew Experience

Captain

Total hours
12,650
On type
236
Duty time
7h 45m rest before flight

Sergei F. Chernetsov

Co-pilot

Total hours
14,650
On type
247
Duty time
9h rest before flight

Vladimir P. Beresnev

Navigator

Total hours
4,630
On type
124
Duty time
9h rest before flight

Vadim Ye. Yurchenko

Flight Engineer

Total hours
3,710
On type
957
Duty time
8h rest before flight

Valery M. Shchegolev

Navigator (Inspector)

Total hours
7,280
On type
310
Duty time
10h 40m rest before flight

Lev B. Uspensky

Flight Engineer (Instructor)

Total hours
9,515
On type
674
Duty time
8h rest before flight

Igor I. Motasov

Flight Radio Operator (Instructor)

Total hours
9,987
On type
602
Duty time
8h rest before flight

Daniil I. Zyazin

Trainee Radio Operator

Total hours
10,460
On type
2
Duty time
8h rest before flight

Andrei V. Zhukov (Trainee with only 2 hours on type despite high total time)

Systems & Failure Modes

i

Horizontal Stabilizer

A movable tail surface used to trim the aircraft; moving it to the 'flight' position during landing caused a fatal nose-down pitch.

i

Elevators

Primary flight controls on the tail; they lacked the surface area to overcome the pitch moment caused by the misaligned stabilizer.

Interesting Facts

  • 01The aircraft was the first Tu-154 to be lost in a fatal accident.
  • 02The cockpit was occupied by eight crew members, including a trainee and two inspectors, in violation of standard flight assignment regulations.
  • 03The aircraft struck the ground 467 meters short of the runway threshold; reports vary on whether the nose wheel or right wing struck first.
  • 04Of the 66 fatalities, 62 were passengers and 4 were cabin crew; all 8 cockpit crew members survived.
  • 0534 people were initially evacuated from the wreckage, but many later succumbed to their injuries or the fire.
  • 06Surviving passengers reported that the design of the seatbelt buckles hindered their escape.

Safety Actions & Advisories

Cockpit Discipline Enforcement

The Soviet Ministry of Civil Aviation reinforced regulations regarding the maximum number of personnel allowed in the cockpit to prevent coordination breakdowns.

Stabilizer Control Design Review

Investigators recommended improvements to the stabilizer switch design to prevent accidental activation and provide better feedback to the crew.

Known Controversies & Unanswered Questions

Discrepancy in Probable Cause

Reference ↗

The Czechoslovak commission officially stated the cause was undetermined, citing possible wind shear or turbulence, whereas the Soviet commission explicitly blamed pilot error and stabilizer misconfiguration.

Location

Near Prague Ruzyně Airport, Czechoslovakia · 50.1178, 14.2789

Case File History

  1. New evidenceUpdated event timeline, investigation summary and findings.
  2. New evidenceUpdated findings.

Related Cases

Case ID · aeroflot-141-1973Last updated · Filed

© 2026 TechBridge Software Co., Ltd. — BlackBoxWiki is an open aviation reference. Not affiliated with any aviation authority.